Moore (James) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Moore (James) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAMES LAMONT MOORE, No. 78985 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, JUL 0 3 2019 Respondent, A. BROWN RENE and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition seeking an order directing the district court to address the claims set forth in petitioner's motion to amend judgment of conviction on the merits and issue an order indicating that petitioner has a right to access the courts and is not a vexatious litigant.
Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").
Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,
SUPREME COURT
et- vrrt, OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned I cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.").
Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
eideu ay ' , J. , J.
Pickering Hardesty
cc: James Lamont Moore Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COuRT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A oat.
I
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.