Howard (Reginald) Vs. State
Howard (Reginald) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
REGINALD CLARENCE HOWARD, No. 79179 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. AUG 1 6 2019 A. BROWN PREME ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying and/or dismissing an amended postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, no postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed in district court. Thus, this appeal appears premature. See NRS 177.015(3).
To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying a motion for leave to amend a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J.
Hardesty
,J Stiglich Silver
Iei,. 31.1‘19r cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Reginald Clarence Howard Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
i.0) 1947A AV*,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.