IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIYACTE HARRIS, No. 79200 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, Respondent, AUG 0 8 2019 A. BROWN and ELI CLERK OF S REME COURI F THE STATE OF NEVADA, SY DEPUTY CLEW Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition• for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to vacate petitioner's judgment of conviction.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix• containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA it/. 330 g' (0) I947A ADD

,.; 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (Petitioned 1 cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

, J.

Pickering Hardesty Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

1 Based upon our determination in this matter, we find it unnecessary to resolve petitioner's motion to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (.0) 1947A QM*.

gr ittl ftgrrae :I 1,1