Brooks (Anthony) Vs. The Second Judicial Dist. Ct.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ANTHONY BROOKS, No. 79237 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

AUG 0 8 2C19 WASHOE, Res • ondent.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to file the motions petitioner contends he has submitted below.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME COURT

1.3stiol Of

NEVADA

(0) 1947A ctlairk 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pickering Hardesty cc: Anthony Brooks

Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk