Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUSTIN D. PORTER, No. 79367 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, AUG 2 9 2g19 Respondent, TIOWN PRELI COURT and r 5
DEPUTY C.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which petitioner contends that he has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial on charges pending against him.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").
Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
Pieko..7 , J. / A eta-41;\ , Pickering Hardesty
cc: Justin D. Porter Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
10) 1947A .00. - :(17:..11111:1 1
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.