Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Muhammad (Rahim) Vs. State

Muhammad (Rahim) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 4, 2019
Muhammad (Rahim) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAHIM MUHAMMAD, No. 79223 Appellant, vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent.

SPP 0 4 2019 A_ BROWN CLE PREME COURT BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUrt CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Scott N. Freeman, Judge.

Appellant has filed a notice to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. This court elects to treat this notice as a motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted. NRAP 42(b).

Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

/.1,4.4; , J.

Hardesty

A/4LX) , J. ,J Stiglich Silver

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a postconviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order. pi- 37010 cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge

Rahim Muhammad

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.