Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Ansary (Dawod) Vs. Dist. Ct. (Warden)

Ansary (Dawod) Vs. Dist. Ct. (Warden)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 13, 2019

Ansary (Dawod) Vs. Dist. Ct. (Warden)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAWOD MOHAMMAD ANSARY, No. 79392 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TIERRA DANIELLE JONES, DISTRICT FILE JUDGE, SEP 9 3 2099 Respondents, ELIZABETH A. BROWN and CLERK7qPREME COURT BY • JERRY HOWELL, WARDEN, DEPtIgfan SDCC/TLVCC, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which petitioner appears to contend that he has been deprived of a hearing on the issue of whether he is entitled to the application of credits to his minimum sentence.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I 947A 4a341. - 3S3S0 ao4 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) C'Petitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

.J.

Gibbons

sZt4,1,\ J. ,J.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Dawod Mohammad Ansary Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A oket. 2 I 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.