Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno
Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; No. 78469 AND RONNIE GUERZON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellants/Cross- Respondents, FILED vs. GABRIEL URENO; GERAD DAVIS; AND BIJO'N PERRY, Respondents/Cross- A. • ellants.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL AS ABANDONED After the settlement judge reported that the parties had agreed to a settlement, this court entered an order directing appellants/cross- respondents to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal and cross- appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal and cross- appeal within 60 days. To date, appellants/cross-respondentss have not responded to our order or otherwise communicated with this court.
Accordingly, cause appearing, we dismiss this appeal and cross-appeal as abandoned.
It is so ORDERED.
Hardesty
J Stiglich Silver
.38174 cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Clark County School District Office of the General Counsel Ganz & Hauf/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.