Brown (Deanthony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Brown (Deanthony) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DEANTHONY BROWN, No. 79447 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, OCT 1 I Respondent, EUZ and BY OF35715`71:647.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, as amended on October 11, 2019, in which petitioner seeks an order directing the clerk of the district court to perform ministerial duties, execute a final judgment of dismissal, and discharge petitioner from custody.
Problematically, petitioner failed to provide this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief.
See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1447A 4441044 ¡q - veqo P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
C.J.
Gibbo s
Pick), LA. A-42\ Pickering j Hardesty
cc: Deanthony Brown Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ADD 2 it!
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.