IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RADE Q. ZONE, No. 79687 Appellant, vs. FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE LLC; AND CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Respondents.

FILED

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal, docketing statement, and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It does not appear that the district court has entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgnient). The challenged order grants summary judgment in favor of respondent Fremont Street Experience, LLC.

But no order appears to resolve appellant's claims against respondent City of Las Vegas. Accordingly, these claims appear to remain pending in the district court. As no other statute or court rule allows an appeal from the challenged order, see Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, ',LC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A .ettir+ - j9r 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"), this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

, J.

Hardesty

/41;4p4...0 , J. J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Rade Q. Zone Las Vegas City Attorney Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'Any aggrieved party may file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a final judgment resolving all claims in the underlying action.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A