Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C.

In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided October 18, 2019

In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENATL No. 79651 RIGHTS AS TO: A. M. C., A MINOR CHILD.

VALENTIN ANTHONY C., Appellant, FILED VS. OCT 1 8 2019 ELIZABETH C., BROWN .

Respondent. CLERK ME COURT 111, BY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion for the appointment of counsel. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Dixie Grossman, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b).

This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an

/9-43vOr appeal from an order denying a motion for the appointment of counsel. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

, J• Hardesty

AlAipi..0 , J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Dixie Grossman, District Judge Valentin Anthony C.

Elizabeth C.

Washoe District Court Clerk

'Given this dismissal, the court takes no action on the pro se documents filed on October 3 and 8, 2019.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (D) I947A .4054,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.