Hendrix (Mitzi) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Hendrix (Mitzi) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MITZI ROCHELLE HENDRIX, No. 79975 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, FILED Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order directing the district court to vacate her conviction for burglary. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support her claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A /9- G/9117 844 (2004) (Petitioned ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
AtlePA UAr P , J. , J. Pickering Hardesty
cc: Mitzi Rochelle Hendrix Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
j,1111111
Reference
- Status
- Published