Li Vs. Gandalf Ventures, Llc
Li Vs. Gandalf Ventures, Llc
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LEI LI, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 79890 Appellant, vs. GANDALF VENTURES, LLC, A DOMESTIC CORPORATION, D/B/A SYNERGY SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL REALITY; ELISA CAROTHERS, AN INDIVIDUAL; DON FLD KUHL, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND MARY DEC 0 2019 TATE, AN INDIVIDUAL, ELIZABETH A. !:3FcOWN CLERKF SUPVE COURT Respondents. BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because appellant's claims against Mary Tate remain pending in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). It also does not appear that any other statute or court rule provides for an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
J. Parraguirre Cadish
cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Lei Li David J. Winterton & Associates, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
"Any aggrieved party rnay file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a final judgment. Sumo.% COURT Of NSVADA
(0} 1947A 2 •
Reference
- Status
- Published