Nunn (Sammie) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nunn (Sammie) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SAMMIE NUNN, No. 80061 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, Respondent, DEC 1 3 2019 ELIZABETA A. BROWN and CLERK OF SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY •‘t DEPUTC1%;::ER HICM).- Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks a stay of proceedings in the district court and a writ directing the district court to permit him to withdraw Ms guilty plea. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1941A, 411kID 5-brg 1 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
Atlett (50 / Ae,t , j. Pickering Hardesty
cc: Sammie Nunn Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1.947A 4,400) 2 ;.• t: • ii;
Reference
- Status
- Published