IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ELOY PADILLA-SALDANA, No. 80066 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, F L• D IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE, DFC L. j 2Cil9 Respondent, • E ROVVN COURT and DEPU-F 7ERK THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to compel the district court to act on the petition for a writ of habeas corpus that petitioner claims he filed in that court. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 4461). I- .57 rvy • P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned ] can-[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

C.J.

Pickering Hardesty

cc: Eloy Padilla-Saldana Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

"We are confident that thè district court will resolve all pending matters as expeditiously as its calendar permits.

SUPREME COURT oç NEVADA

(0) 1947A alifibm. 2