IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MITZI ROCHELLE HENDRIX, No. 80220 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus.

Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of •the burglary statute and seeks an order directing the district court to vacate her conviction for burglary.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support her claims for relief.

See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1547A zo-oe3tr P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (Petitioned ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

, J.

Pickering Hardesty

cc: Mitzi Rochelle Hendrix Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT NEVADA O IW7A 400 2 If