IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARCUS A. REIF, AN INCOMPETENT No. 79067 PERSON BY AND THROUGH HIS CONSERVATOR, CINDY REIF, FILED Appellant, vs. JAN 0 6 2620 ARIES CONSULTANTS, INC., A BROWN ELI NEVADA CORPORATION, CIE REME COURT Res a ondent. BY OEPUrf CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment in a negligence action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge.

This court's review of the amended docketing statement revealed a potential jurisdictional defect. It appeared that the challenged district court order was not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because appellant's claims against Edgewater Gaming, LLC and Gillett Construction, LLC remained pending in the district court.

Accordingly, this court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

In response, appellant acknowledges that claims remain pending in the district court against Edgewater Gaming, LLC and Gillett Construction, LLC, and the challenged order was not certified as final under NRCP 54(b). Appellant nevertheless contends that the order is appealable as a final judgment because there are no remaining claims in the district court against respondent. This contention lacks merit. Where claims remain pending in the district court against other parties, the challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 44/Ata D"-#010bbi Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment as "one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and coste).1 Appellant requests, as an alternative to dismissal, that this court allow a 30-day extension of time to seek a NRCP 54(b) certification.

More than 30 days has passed since appellant sought leave to obtain a NRCP 54(b) certification and no such certification has been filed in this court. Further, the district court docket entries do not indicate that any motion for certification has been filed in the district court. Accordingly, the motion for an extension of time is denied. This denial does not preclude appellant from seeking NRCP 54(b) certification in the district court, if deemed warranted.

As no final judgment has been entered in the district court and it does not appear that any other statute or court rule allows an appeal from the challenged order, see Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule), this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

MAtC4.4 Stiglich Silver

lIn the order to show cause, this court also disputed appellant's representations in the docketing statement that the order was appealable under NRS 233B.150 or NRS 703.376. Appellant concedes in his response that these statutes are not applicable.

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC/Los Angeles Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC/New York Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 610#19