Szymborski Vs. Spring Mountain Treatment Ctr.
Szymborski Vs. Spring Mountain Treatment Ctr.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LEE E. SZYMBORSKI, No. 80362 Appellant, vs. SPRING MOUNTAIN TREATMENT CENTER, Res • ondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to reset trial as jury trial. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b).
This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for jury trial. This court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
,J Hardesty Cadish
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA z,o 014 Z- (0) 1947A =lap
_ „AIN itiBEIN! TEO itiff11111MEI All cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Lee E. Szymborski Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
19) L947A APO
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.