Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince
Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ERIC MENDOZA AND MICHELLE No. 78484 MENDOZA, PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF CHARLES MENDOZA, A MINOR; ERIC MENDOZA, INDIVIDUALLY; AND MICHELLE MENDOZA, FILED INDIVIDUALLY, JAN 1 7 thal Appellants, A. BROWN EH PREMF COURT vs. CLE BY EGLET PRINCE; AND THE GALLIHER DEPU1Y CLERK LAW FIRM, Res • ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42 (b) .
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRO BY:
cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Kristine M. Kuzemka, Settlement Judge Ireland Law Group, LLC The Law Offices of Laura Hunt, PC Prince Law Group The Galliher Law Firm Eglet Adams Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947 .49, ao.- • T, q• •1
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.