Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince
Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ERIC MENDOZA AND MICHELLE No. 78484 MENDOZA, PARENTS AND
GUARDIANS OF CHARLES
MENDOZA, A MINOR; ERIC
MENDOZA, INDIVIDUALLY; AND
MICHELLE MENDOZA,
FILED INDIVIDUALLY, JAN 1 7 thal Appellants, A. BROWN EH PREMF COURT vs. CLE BY EGLET PRINCE; AND THE GALLIHER DEPU1Y CLERK LAW FIRM,
Res • ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42 (b) .
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRO BY:
cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge
Kristine M. Kuzemka, Settlement Judge
Ireland Law Group, LLC
The Law Offices of Laura Hunt, PC
Prince Law Group
The Galliher Law Firm
Eglet Adams
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947 .49, ao.- • T, q• •1
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.