IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

INTEGRITY WEALTH BUILDERS, No. 79947 LLC; AND HILL EQUITY GROUP, LLC, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JAN 2 3 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE IZA.

CLERK V COURT ELIZABETH GOFF GONZALEZ, BY DISTRICT JUDGE, DEPUTY CLUX Respondents, and SERGIO D. ORTIZ, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss and staying the underlying case.

Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Generally, we will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the general rule applies here. Int? Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

0) 19474 4%* -0-012:710 ' t Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 566, 558-59 (2008). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

Platt C.J.

Pickering

J.

Gibb

, Sr. J.

Douglas

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Dziminski Law Group Law Offices of John Benedict Law Offices of P. Sterling Kerr Eighth District Court Clerk

IThe Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 19.74

ER