Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)

Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 27, 2020

Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, A No. 80450 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioners, FILED VS. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT :A. BR :61 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 'PREME COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JOYCE SEKERA, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original, emergency petition for a writ of mandanius or prohibition challenges a district court order denying summary judgment based on the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act's exclusive remedy provision.

Having considered petitioners arguments and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted in this matter. Petitioners have an adequate and speedy legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment, precluding writ

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 40r, 031,k3 relief. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 225, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1

J.

Stiglich

J.

Silver

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Royal & Miles, LLP Claggett & Sykes Law Firm The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

1In light of this order, petitioners emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A 4010.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.