Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, A No. 80450 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY; AND LAS VEGAS SANDS,
LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY,
Petitioners,
FILED VS.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT :A. BR :61 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 'PREME COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT
JUDGE,
Respondents, and
JOYCE SEKERA, AN INDIVIDUAL,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original, emergency petition for a writ of mandanius or prohibition challenges a district court order denying summary judgment based on the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act's exclusive remedy provision. Having considered petitioners arguments and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted in this matter. Petitioners have an adequate and speedy legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment, precluding writ
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A 40r,
031,k3 relief. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 225, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1
J. Stiglich
J. Silver cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Royal & Miles, LLP
Claggett & Sykes Law Firm
The Galliher Law Firm
Eighth District Court Clerk
1In light of this order, petitioners emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) I947A 4010.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.