Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)

Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 27, 2020
Venetian Casino Resort, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Sekera)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, A No. 80450 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY; AND LAS VEGAS SANDS,

LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY,

Petitioners,

FILED VS.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT :A. BR :61 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 'PREME COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT

JUDGE,

Respondents, and

JOYCE SEKERA, AN INDIVIDUAL,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original, emergency petition for a writ of mandanius or prohibition challenges a district court order denying summary judgment based on the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act's exclusive remedy provision. Having considered petitioners arguments and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted in this matter. Petitioners have an adequate and speedy legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment, precluding writ

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A 40r,

031,k3 relief. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 225, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1

J. Stiglich

J. Silver cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Royal & Miles, LLP

Claggett & Sykes Law Firm

The Galliher Law Firm

Eighth District Court Clerk

1In light of this order, petitioners emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I947A 4010.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.