Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Dickinson Vs. Sunshine Moving Of Am., Inc.

Dickinson Vs. Sunshine Moving Of Am., Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 5, 2020

Dickinson Vs. Sunshine Moving Of Am., Inc.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAMES DICKINSON, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 78136 AND DONNA DICKINSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. FILED SUNSHINE MOVING OF AMERICA, FEB 0 5 2020 INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, eRow( Res • ondent. ", RENE COURT.

OE.PUTY CLERK ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is an appeal from a district court order denying a request for attorney fees. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lynne K.

Simons, Judge.1 We are not persuaded that the district court erred in declining to award attorney fees. "[Allthough allegations in the pleadings are deemed admitted as a result of the entry of default," Foster v. Dingwall, 126 Nev. 56, 68, 227 P.3d 1042, 1050 (2010), "a party in default does not admit mere conclusions of law," Marshall v. Baggett, 616 F.3d 849, 852 (8th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). See also DIRECTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh, 503 F.3d 847, 854 (9th Cir. 2007) (recognizing that a defaulted defendant does not admit to conclusions of law); Nishimatsu Const. Co. v. Houston Nat'l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975) (same). Here, respondent argues that whether it engaged in a deceptive trade practice is a legal conclusion rather than a factual allegation.

Appellants have not addressed this argument, which we otherwise find persuasive. Cf. Ozawa v. Vision Airlines, Inc., 125 Nev. 556, 563, 216 P.3d

'Pursuant to NRAP 3401), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

ICU I947A 4DP - €4911 788, 793 (2009) (treating a party's failure to respond to an argument as a concession that the argument is meritorious). Because the district court determined that respondent had not engaged in deceptive trade practices, NRS 598.0977 did not authorize an award of attorney fees. We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.2

Adam. , C.J.

Pickering

, J. , Sr. J.

Hardesty Douglas

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge J. Douglas Clark, Settlement Judge Argentum Law Richard G. Hill, Ltd. Washoe District Court Clerk

2The Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA O. 1947A 4141a

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.