IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GERALD JEROME POLK, No. 80552 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the Nevada Department of Corrections application of good time credits under NRS 209.4465. Petitioner contends that NDOC is improperly applying NRS 209.4465(8) to deny application of credits to his minimum sentence.

We have considered the petition, and we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.170; NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Petitioner is challenging the computation of time he has served. A postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the county in which the petitioner is incarcerated "[is] the only remedy available to an incarcerated person to challenge the computation of time that the person has served pursuant to a judgment of

ze -Obi 2it. *sc. tilvsl ìet conviction." NRS 34.724(2)(c); see NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1

Pitieut7 ' C.J.

Pickering • j" J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Gerald Jerome Polk Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents Li essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). This constitutes an additional basis for denying relief.

•11111E1