Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Hernandez (Esteban) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Hernandez (Esteban) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 13, 2020

Hernandez (Esteban) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ESTEBAN HERNANDEZ, No; 80502 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, FEB 1 3 2020 Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to provide him with his co-defendant's sealed records.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief.

See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

&.1 tillit11111111E1 11 We reiterate that "[p]etitioned ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

e• A CA-A 4.62\ J. J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Esteban Hernandez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.