Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Davis (Raymond) Vs. State

Davis (Raymond) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 18, 2020

Davis (Raymond) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80501 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILED FEB 1 8 20 EL R.ROWN CLERK mE CouRV - BY DEPUIY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to dismiss counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.

The court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to dismiss counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provided for an appeal, no right to appeal exists).

Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

A'aJbaug , tj-Zejx60 Stiglich Silver

SUPREUE COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 4010 zo-gwoi P':.tli ' ta i cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Mueller & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A *GPO 2 ". • 1 11 141 'n 1r II'

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.