IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VICTOR TAGLE, SR., No. 80551 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Res • ondent.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks dismissal of charges he claims were "made under false arrest." Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief.

See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the clainis raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

We reiterate that "[p]etitioned I cardies] the burden• of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth

SUPREM Courrr OF NEVADA

to) 1947A 44011c, 4?-< 1111 4.4 Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

/ Hardesty Cadish

cc: Victor Tagle, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) INTA 41100 2 4a.q 1 11