Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State

Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 20, 2020

Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAFIK VARTANPOUR, No. 80487 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILED FEB A. BROWN CLE F•REME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for an order directing the district court clerk to issue a presentence investigation report to appellant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).

Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

MA.V4.4 kale:64V3 , J.

Stiglich Silver

to-V(0113 cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Rafik Vartanpour Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SupRem Com Of NEVADA

(0) 1947A data 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.