Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Davis (Raymond) Vs. State

Davis (Raymond) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 21, 2020
Davis (Raymond) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80454 FILE Appellant, i-E_B 2 1 202 vs. EL1 THE STATE OF NEVADA, CLE BY Respondent. DEPUTY CLERK

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80455 */ Appellant, vs.

THE STATE• OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80456 Appellant, vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80569 Appellant, vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These are pro se appeals from pretrial orders denying an "order of retriar; denying defendant's request for self-representation; denying a motion to recuse; and denying a motion to dismiss under Doggett v. United SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A zi) States. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.

This court's review of these appeals reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from orders denying the aforementioned motions. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS these appeals DISMISSED.

"CLC"il'Vm.s7r

Parraguirre

J. Hardesty Cadish cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Mueller & Associates

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEvAna

(0) 1947A MIROD

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.