Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Auberry (Glenn) Vs. State

Auberry (Glenn) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 21, 2020

Auberry (Glenn) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GLENN AUBERRY, No. 79 Appellant, LED vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, f-E.B 2 1 2020 Res ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 87-0'13re CLERK This is a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that she has informed appellant of the legal consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever waived. Having been so informed, Appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Hardesty Cadish

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.

We take no action in regard to the motion to withdraw as counsel filed by attorney Jeannie N. Hua on January 16, 2020. See NRAP 46(d)(3).

Z - 71r F cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Jeannie N. Hua Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) INIA .4141DM, 2 IS:Wilt' iiii=1111, EJ

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.