IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LEONARD MORGAN HAIRSTON, No. 80587 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, Respondent, 8 2 7 'Ajjt12.0 and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to vacate petitioner's judgment of conviction, which he contends the district court entered when it lacked jurisdiction.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief.

See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

7,49-019S1 - We reiterate that Ipletitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

(lam .J.

Pickering

J. CetafA , J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Leonard Morgan Hairston Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COUR/ OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A atirilm 2 1.:441E.