Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi

Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 2020

Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KATHEA SUZUKI-LATHAM, AN No. 80486 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. JOHN ANTHONY CODI, AN INDIVIDUAL, Res • ondent. FILED FEB 2 8 retChitlti CLERK çf SUýREME C" BY DEFUrYCLER<

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from an order granting defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment and judgment in favor of defendant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to have been prematurely filed under NRAP 4(a) because there is a pending motion to reconsider in the district court. This court may dismiss as premature a notice of appeal filed before entry of the written disposition of the last remaining timely motion listed in NRAP 4(a)(4). See AA Prirno Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (explaining when a motion for reconsideration has tolling effect under NRAP 4(a)(4)(C)); NRAP 4(a)(6). We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and accordingly we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

J.

Cadish

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Kathea Suzuki-Latharn Ranalli Zaniel Fowler & Moran, LLC/Henderson Eighth District Court Clerk

SUFFIEME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ASO. 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.