Hill Vs. Leiataua
Hill Vs. Leiataua
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
THOMAS C. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 80048 Appellant, vs. SERINA TULILI LEIATAUA, INDIVIDUALLY, Res • ondent.
THOMAS C. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 80101 " Appellant, vs. SERINA TULILI LEIATAUA, FILE INDIVIDUALLY, FEB 2 8 2020 Res • ondent.
ELL-7,ALET`i A BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS DEPUTY CIRic cl On February 12, 2020, appellant filed a letter1 regarding notice of settlement in these two matters, which we elect to treat as a motion to dismiss these appeals. Cause appearing, the motion is granted, and these appeals are dismissed. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN BY 4i4i1A4e-C ' ;/11"41"s1--Y
1 Counsel for appellant is advised that the proper way to communicate with the court is by way of a formal motion, not by way of a letter. See SUPREME COURT OF Weddell v. Stewart, 127 Nev. 645, 652 n.8, 261 P.3d 1080, 1085 n.8 (2011).
NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER to] 1947 ., 020-08180 cc: Hon. Michael A. Cherry, Senior Justice Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP/Las Vegas Eric Blank Injury Attorneys Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERKS ORDER 0.1) (947 •=4ir.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.