Hill Vs. Leiataua
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
THOMAS C. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 80048 Appellant, vs.
SERINA TULILI LEIATAUA,
INDIVIDUALLY,
Res iondent.
THOMAS C. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 80101 Appellant, vs.
SERINA TULILI LEIATAUA,
FILE INDIVIDUALLY,
FEB 2 8 2020 Res ondent.
EL1 -riA BROWN CLERK Of- SUPREME COURT' ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS BY 6 DEPUTY CLERK
On February 12, 2020, appellant filed a letter1 regarding notice of settlement in these two matters, which we elect to treat as a motion to dismiss these appeals. Cause appearing, the motion is granted, and these appeals are dismissed. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN -AeLtitar--- BY
1 Counsel for appellant is advised that the proper way to communicate with the court is by way of a formal motion, not by way of a letter. See SUPREME COURT
OF
Weddell v. Stewart, 127 Nev. 645, 652 n.8, 261 P.3d 1080, 1085 n.8 (2011). NEVADA
CLERKS ORDER (0) 1947 ataND cc: Hon. Michael A. Cherry, Senior Justice
Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge
Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP/Las Vegas Eric Blank Injury Attorneys
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER o), 1947 c4gt.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.