Freelove Vs. Freelove (Child Custody)
Freelove Vs. Freelove (Child Custody)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUSTIN FREELOVE, No. 80642 Appellant, vs. LYNSEY FREELOVE, Fii5 „ 73 D Respondent.
,t. nnow-Nt COU BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL cLaRK
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion to relocate and modify child custody and modifying visitation. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Bridget E. Robb, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of the judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The order on the hearing was entered on October 2, 2019; written notice of entry was served electronically on counsel on October 4, 2019. The notice of appeal was not filed until February 18, 2020, well beyond the 30 days provided in NRAP 4(a)(1). This court lacks jurisdiction, and therefore ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, - "C Pa elmit raguirrei lt Irammili
, J.
Hardesty Cadish SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 400 v0 - cc: Hon. Bridget E. Robb, District Judge Justin Freelove Anderson Keuscher, PLLC Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 40. 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.