Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.

In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 19, 2020

In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL No. 80624 RIGHTS AS TO A.M.

GIANO A., Petitioner, .

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, -' e rt:Acrts CLER)Í PE CO MT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF • BY CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DEPUIY CLEAK MATHEW HARTER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JENNIFER M.M., Real Party in Interest.

ORDER .DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court's order denying a stay motion in an action to terminate petitioner's parental rights. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004.) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER. the petition ._ tkIED.

A Gibbo• s

J. 1461Z4a,L) , J.

Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA jo f (0; I 94TA cc: Hon. Mathew Harter, District judge Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas Jennifer M.M.

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COUFtT OF NEVADA I 4,17A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.