Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Mcglamery Vs. Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys. Of Nev.

Mcglamery Vs. Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys. Of Nev.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 26, 2020

Mcglamery Vs. Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys. Of Nev.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN R. MCGLAMERY, No. 80609 Appellant, vs. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEVADA, A PUBLIC F AGENCY; AND TERESA MCGLAMERY, N/K/A TERESA BLUME, MAR 2 Res ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro sel appeal from a post-judgment district court order granting a motion for attorney fees. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Bridget E. Robb, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. While an order awarding attorney fees is generally appealable as a special order after final judgment, see NRAP 3A(b)(8), here the order is not appealable because it does not• resolve the issue of attorney fees with finality. The order does not award any amount of attorney fees. The order grants respondent Public Employees' Retirement System of Nevada (PERS) additional time to file supplemental documents or records, allows appellant time to file an objection and PERS time to file a reply and states that either party may then resubmit the

'Appellant is a licensed Nevada attorney.

SAJPRBAE COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ADE. zo- 1 I WI( ittg .• Teo- matter to the court for a determination of whether the requested fees are reasonable. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.2

„41,A,41.4.1,1 , J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Bridget E. Robb, District Judge John R. McGlamery McDonald Carano LLP/Reno Todd L. Torvinen Washoe District Court Clerk

2Appellant may file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters an order fully resolving the attorney fee issue, if he is aggrieved by that order.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A Gar> 2 71N'

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.