Battle, Jr. (Jack) Vs. State
Battle, Jr. (Jack) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JACK JOSEPH BATTLE, JR., No. 80702 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. APR 0 1 2020 BROWN
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL °Y EPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to clarify sentencing and a motion for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.
Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.21 1133, 1135 (1990). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to clarify sentencing and a motion for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference. Accordingly, we ORDER this ap al DISMISSED.
C"1:16141"2.7 Parraguirre
, J.
Hardesty Cadish SUPREME COUR', OF New.% (0) 1947A aigera
ll cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Jack Joseph Battle, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 4610,0 2 it11111111•111 t.. WIT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.