Robinson Vs. Waldo
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RONALD J. ROBINSON, No. 78790
Appellant, VS.
REVA WALDO,
Respondent.
FILE. APR 0 9 2. ,020 ELI - - 'P- BROWN CLERieREME COURT SY
DEPUTY 00:127-
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an amended judgment and an order awarding attorney fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Timothy C. Williams, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal revealed a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the appeal appeared to be untimely and this court issued an order to show cause. Appellant responded to the order to show cause and agreed that the appeal was untimely. Appellant further provides that the underlying judgment does not fully and finally resolve the matters between respondent and other parties in the underlying matter and the district court never certified the judgment under NRCP 54(b), and that
SUPREME COURT
OF
Z0-111107- NevADA
(0) 1447A
'1 111111 C:1; akint9111.11 latilinffti therefore the judgment is not a final and appealable judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction and
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
-CLamj4V.gma.:11"
Parraguirre
, J. Hardesty Cadish cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Ltd. Law Offices of David Liebrader, Inc. Eighth District Court Clerk "Any aggrieved party may file a new notice of appeal upon entry of any appealable order or judgment.
SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .4110. 2
MUIR it .1W1`
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.