Robinson Vs. Waldo
Robinson Vs. Waldo
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RONALD J. ROBINSON, No. 78790 Appellant, VS. REVA WALDO, Respondent.
FILE.
APR 0 9 2. ,020 ELI - - 'P- BROWN CLERieREME COURT SY DEPUTY 00:127-
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from an amended judgment and an order awarding attorney fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Timothy C. Williams, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal revealed a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the appeal appeared to be untimely and this court issued an order to show cause. Appellant responded to the order to show cause and agreed that the appeal was untimely. Appellant further provides that the underlying judgment does not fully and finally resolve the matters between respondent and other parties in the underlying matter and the district court never certified the judgment under NRCP 54(b), and that
SUPREME COURT OF
Z0-111107- NevADA (0) 1447A
'1 111111 C:1; akint9111.11 latilinffti therefore the judgment is not a final and appealable judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
-CLamj4V.gma.:11" Parraguirre
, J.
Hardesty Cadish
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Ltd. Law Offices of David Liebrader, Inc. Eighth District Court Clerk
"Any aggrieved party may file a new notice of appeal upon entry of any appealable order or judgment.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .4110. 2 MUIR it .1W1`
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.