Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State

Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 16, 2020

Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FRANCISCO ENRIQUE VIDAL, No. 80941 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

APR Ei 2020 0_17.1 SROVOZ CLERKQf sUFE

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration. in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

LL:144i/D , J.

Stiglich. Silver

SUPPE/4E COURT OF

To- p4ro NEVADA

(0) 1947A vialo •.tS 4 ,J,e• • - A cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Francisco Enrique Vidal Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4111114.-12 ;A ii

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.