Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FRANCISCO ENRIQUE VIDAL, No. 80941 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
APR Ei 2020 0_17.1 SROVOZ CLERKQf sUFE
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration. in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).
Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
LL:144i/D , J.
Stiglich. Silver
SUPPE/4E COURT OF
To- p4ro NEVADA
(0) 1947A vialo •.tS 4 ,J,e• • - A cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Francisco Enrique Vidal Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4111114.-12 ;A ii
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.