Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARLENE ROGOFF, No. 80829 Appellant, VS. FILED JAMES MARSH, Res_pondent. APR 1 620 A. EROWN >E<a3E COURT DEPUTY. CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a post-judgment district court order determining appellant to be a vexatious litigant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.
Review of appellant notice of appeal and the other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a post-judgment vexatious litigant order. Peck v. Crouser, 129 Nev. 120, 295 P.3d 586 (2013). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
Gibbons
Al4C44...0 J.
Stiglich Silver
'Respondent's /notion to dismiss this appeal is denied as moot and the request for sanctions is denied.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A <SWF 7,0-itig4$0 za7 1 II cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Marlene Rogoff The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.