Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Rogoff Vs. Marsh

Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 16, 2020
Rogoff Vs. Marsh

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MARLENE ROGOFF, No. 80829

Appellant, VS.

FILED JAMES MARSH,

Res_pondent. APR 1 620

A. EROWN >E<a3E COURT

DEPUTY. CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a post-judgment district court order determining appellant to be a vexatious litigant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.

Review of appellant notice of appeal and the other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a post-judgment vexatious litigant order. Peck v. Crouser, 129 Nev. 120, 295 P.3d 586 (2013). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

Gibbons Al4C44...0 J.

Stiglich Silver

'Respondent's /notion to dismiss this appeal is denied as moot and the request for sanctions is denied.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A <SWF 7,0-itig4$0 za7

1 II cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge

Marlene Rogoff The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.