Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Cox Vs. Saw-Will, Inc.

Cox Vs. Saw-Will, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 16, 2020

Cox Vs. Saw-Will, Inc.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BARRYMORE COX, No. 80869 Appellant, vs. SAW-WILL, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, D/B/A FREMONT F1LFD HOTEL AND CASINO; AND M.

LUTLEY, AN INDIVIDUAL, Res • ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a commissioner's decision on challenge to authority or action of arbitrator. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a commissioner's decision on a challenge to the authority or action of an arbitrator. Moreover, the decision is not signed by a district court judge. A decision that is not signed by a district court judge cannot be appealed. See State, Div. of Child and Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) ("[D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective"); NRAP 3A(b) (allowing appeals from orders of the district court); NRCP 58(c) (providing that no judgment is effective SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 442gto, . 1 $.1qqr .1,7( for any purpose until it is signed by the court and filed with the clerk).

Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Gibbons jetty.14.4 , J. J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Barrymore Cox M. Lutley Olson, Cannon, Gormley, & Stoberski Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.