IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DENISA VREELING, No. 81050 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE APR 2 202a CHERYL B. MOSS, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELI7 tec A. BROWN CLERi9OF %. LIPREM • RT Respondents, BY DEPUTY CLERK and CARL ADOLF VREELING, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/ OR PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges an April 20, 2020, district court order temporarily modifying parenting time in a child custody matter.

Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is warranted to remedy an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. See Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008) (mandamus is proper to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist.

Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing that such relief is

&inv.* COURT OF NEVADA 1(1) 1947A diDx.

10 • S3/11 warranted); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DEMED.1

--CLa ch—ctifte—: J.

Parraguirre

J.

Hardesty

J.

Cadish

cc: Hon. Cheryl B. Moss, District Judge, Family Court Division Fine Carman Price The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.0 Eighth District Court Clerk

lIn light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10) 1947A 416,jVc.