Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARLENE ROGOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 80799 Appellant, vs. JAMES MARSH, AN INDIVIDUAL, Respondent.
FILE APR 2 7 2020 IZABETil A. PA'OWN CLEHri OF SUPREME COURT By 6At OEFAITCYI*361 * *
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to reopen case and set aside judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge.
Appellant appealed to the district court from a justice court order. After the district court entered an order denying and dismissing appellant's appeal, appellant moved the district court to reopen the case and set aside judgment. Following the denial of that motion, appellant appealed to this court.
The district court has final appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising in justice courts. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Although NRAP 3A(b)(8) authorizes an appeal from an order denying a motion under NRCP 60(b), see Holiday Inn v. Barnett, 103 Nev. 60, 63, 732 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), because the order challenged in this case arose from the district courVs exercise of appellate jurisdiction over an appeal from a justice court decision, the district court's
0-isciso order is not appealable to this court. Accordingly, as this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. LIZ414iIt) , J.
Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Marlene Rogoff Bruce A. Leslie, Chtd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
-$---• • • _
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.