Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Sandoval (Wilfredo) Vs. State

Sandoval (Wilfredo) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 1, 2020

Sandoval (Wilfredo) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WILFREDO SANDOVAL, No. 80974 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

F MAY 0 1 2020 EtiZAIEM E;P.OWN CLERK • "••• ,c.'_:,1.a COURT BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying a motion to modify and/or correct an illegal sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

The documents before this court indicate that a motion to modify and/or correct an illegal sentence has not been filed in district court case number C-18-335858-1, the designated district court case number in this appeal. To the extent that appellant's appeal is in regard to the judgment of conviction entered on September 10, 2019, the notice of appeal was untimely filed.

Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944 (1994) (stating that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). To the extent that appellant appeals from the minute order granting a motion to withdraw as counsel, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order.

Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990) (the right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Par guirre

J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Wilfredo Sandoval Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.