Dahir (Shane) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SHANE MICHAEL DAHIR, No. 81089 Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILE Respondent. P•IAY 1 5 2020 EMMEN A. BROWN CLERK X SUPREME COURT EY FIEPU‘t I CL lEl ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no decision had been made on the motion when appellant filed his appeal on April 23, 2020.1 Thus, this appeal is premature. See NRS 177.015(3) (stating that a defendant only may appeal from a final judgment or verdict). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
,Al•ks.-0 t4 , J. J Stiglich 6 Silver lA hearing is scheduled for June 1, 2020.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A allatia a -I Vogl cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge
Shane Michael Dahir
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I 947A 2 •
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.