Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 20, 2020

Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MAYRA ARACELI TARANGO, No. 81095 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAY 2 0 'Llin CLARK, ELI BROYM CLE PREME COURT Respondent, BY and DEPUT: CLERK THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to vacate her judgement of conviction and allowing her to withdraw her guilty plea and proceed to a jury trial.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or documentation that would support her claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A eatettl.

74- 1923° We reiterate that Ipletitioned j cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

It is so ORDERED.

Ade. ,C.J.

Pickering

/ A,..e..../.., , J. .#41;114" ,J Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Mayra Araceli Tarango Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.