Davis (Raymond) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 81181 Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent.
MAY 2 8 :'ij•.=t1 EL17.tE11:32074.1 CLERK F i-JÆ COUR • BY DEMI Y CL RK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for own recognizance release based on the changed circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 crisis. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.
The court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for own recognizance release based on the changed circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 crisis. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Gibb
./egtaai , J. , J. Stiglich Silver SUPREME Cara
OF
NEVADA il0) 1947A 44014 - Apt, cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Raymond Tyrone Davis
Mueller & Associates
Attorney Generai/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(01 1947A edam 2
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.