Somersett Owners Ass'N Vs. Somersett Dev. Co., Ltd.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SOMERSETT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, No. 79920 1 A DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT

CORPORATION,

Appellant, vs.

SOMERSETT DEVELOPMENT

HL COMPANY, LTD., A NEVADA LIMITED JUN 0 '3 'La, LIABILITY COMPANY; SOMERSETT, I7 ET .fROWiI LLC, A DISSOLVED NEVADA CLE :WEB OURY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; BY DEP -Y CI_ERK SOMERSETT DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION, A DISSOLVED

NEVADA CORPORATION; Q & D

CONSTRUCTION, INC., A NEVADA

CORPORATION; PARSONS BROS

ROCKERIES, INC., A WASHINGTON

CORPORATION; AND STANTEC

CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.,

Res s ondents.

SOMERS= OWNERS ASSOCIATION, No. 79921 A DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT

CORPORATION,

Appellant, vs.

SOMERSETT DEVELOPMENT

COMPANY, LTD., A NEVADA LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY; SOMERSETT,

LLC, A DISSOLVED NEVADA

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;

SOMERS= DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION, A DISSOLVED

NEVADA CORPORATION; Q & D

CONSTRUCTION, INC., A NEVADA

CORPORATION; PARSONS BROS

ROCKERIES, INC., A WASHINGTON

CORPORATION; AND STANTEC

CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.,

SUPREAE COUPT

Respondents.

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A digThe} 7,0, r12- ;-71 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, No. 80843 INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION,

Appellant, vs.

SOMERSETT OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

A DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT

CORPORATION,

Res • ondent.

Q & D CONSTRUCTION, INC., A No. 80880 NEVADA CORPORATION,

Appellant, vs.

SOMERSETT OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

A DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT

CORPORATION,

Res ondent.

SOMERSETT DEVELOPMENT No. 80881 COMPANY, LTD., A NEVADA LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY; SOMERSETT,

LLC, A DISSOLVED NEVADA

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND

SOMERSETT DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION, A DISSOLVED

NEVADA CORPORATION,

Appellants, vs.

SOMERSETT OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

A DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT

CORPORATION,

Res • ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL, REINSTATING BRIEFING, AND GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

The appeals in Docket Nos. 79920 and 79921 were consolidated on March 30, 2020. On May 1, 2020, this court entered an order in Docket No. 79920, directing appellant Somersett Owners Association to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it SUPREME COURT appeared that no statute or court rule allowed for an appeal from an order OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A eo 2 denying a motion to strike as moot. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Somersett Owners Association filed a response to the order to show cause and agrees that the court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal in Docket No. 79920 is hereby dismissed, and briefing is reinstated in Docket No. 79921. Somersett Owners Association filed a motion in Docket Nos. 80843, 80880, and 80881 to consolidate those appeals with Docket No. 79921. These appeals arise from the same district court case and involve the same parties. This court concludes that in the interest of judicial economy, these appeals should be consolidated. Accordingly, Docket Nos. 79221, 80843, 80880, and 80881 shall be consolidated for all appellate purposes. See NRAP 3(b).

Appellants in all appeals shall have until July 30, 2020, to file and serve the opening briefs and appendices. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1).

It is so ORDERED.

friljeekal51 Parraguirre 6**e7.72

Hardesty

J.

Cadish cieak, , J.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

10/ 1947A 40/10fr. 3 _ cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Paul F. Hamilton, Settlement Judge

Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP/Las Vegas Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP /Reno Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno Lee, Landrum & Carlson, APC

Hoy Chrissinger Kimmel Vallas, P.C.

Castronova Law Offices, P.C.

Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NOMA

(0) 1947A 4