Forte (Derrell) Vs. State
Forte (Derrell) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DERRELL WAYNE FORTE, No. 81116 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. JUN 1 0 2020 EL1ZABE1 A. BROM CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY DEPtgY-jst2 C A MK.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from the "denial of rehearing on March 17, 2020." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal frorn an order denying a motion for rehearing, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Parraguirre
, J. ,J Hardesty Cadish
'The order entered on March 30, 2020, also denied a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea. However, that order was not designated in the notice of appeal. See NRAP 3(c)(1)(B) (providing that notice of appeal shall "designate the judgment, order or part thereof being appealed").
016 -,2/773 cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Derrell Wayne Forte Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 I947A arKgiEr.. 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.