Steinhauer Vs. Dzurenda
Steinhauer Vs. Dzurenda
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAVID MICHAEL STEINHAUER, No. 80324 Appellant, vs. JAMES DZURENDA; DR. MICHAEL MINEV; AND PERRY RUSSELL, PILE Res o ondents. JUN 1 8 2020 ELIZARF.rri A. DROWN CLERK OF SUPREMZ COURT DEPU7 Y CEA r: ORDER DISMISISNG APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a petition for writ of mandamus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.
On January 6, 2020, this court issued a notice to appellant setting forth the deadlines for filing of documents. Pursuant to that order, the transcript request forrn was due within 14 days, the docketing statement was due within 21 days, and the opening brief was due within days, or by May 5, 2020. To date, appellant has filed none of the required documents and has not communicated with this court.
Respondents have filed a motion to disrniss this appeal, and appellant has not responded to the motion. The motion is granted. It appears appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Parraguirre
J. J.
Hardesty Cadish SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 414§Da4 •620- ,2.1713 .
6, cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge David Michael Steinhauer Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4E4. 2 „
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.